It is now 11 years since my book Authenticity came out. I was fascinated by the re-emergence of so many of those elements of modern life which were supposed to have been consigned to the dustbin of technology - radio, bricks, bicycles, trams, natural fibres, bread-making (most real food was supposed to be too inconvenient; remember the Smash advert robots?).
This element I borrowed partly from the French medievalist Jean Gimpel in his book The End of the Future, which predicted this first. I like to think I made the argument a bit more forward-looking. This is what I wrote back then:
"At the same time, we have also seen the emergence of an articulate but growing minority of the population who are rejecting the idea that the unstoppable march of progress meant a fake, second-rate world and are demanding something authentic – real human contact, real experience, real connection. They don’t just want authenticity – this is no puritanical return: they want to enjoy getting drunk occasionally, they want fast food when it’s convenient, and they certainly want to use the internet. But they don’t want that to be their only choice. They want something authentic to go back to."
Well, they seem to be going back to it. But I was fascinated to see this quotation in the Guardian's report, from Stephen Godfroy from record chain Rough Trade:
This remains controversial. Most commentators would accept that it is true, but they fall out about what it might mean. But people certainly value what is real. You can see it in virtually every area of life - it even explains the particularly fraught relationship between voters and the big political parties. I think they may value authenticity increasingly...
Unfortunately, copies of Authenticity now seem to be virtually unobtainable. But I've updated my argument in my ebook The Age to Come.
Subscribe to this blog on email; send me a message with the word blogsubscribe to firstname.lastname@example.org. When you want to stop, you can email me the word unsubscribe