What comes after post-modernism? I asked a couple of posts ago - and did so partly to encourage people to buy my book which (I modestly suggests) contains the answer.
I've had a number of completely contradictory responses - congratulatory messages on Facebook, a cascade of articles about the impossibility of objective truth, and defending the prevailing post-modern culture. For Liberals, these are difficult issues - because I am suggesting there is a lazy, corrosive kind of liberalism, and we need to move beyond it to find a high, more demanding Liberalism, a Liberalism with depth, which has some chance of surviving another century.
The
ages at a glance
Modernist
|
Post-modernist
|
New Humanist
|
|
Emerging nation
|
Germany
|
France
|
UK
|
Presiding ethic
|
Truth
|
Tolerance
|
Wholeness
|
Besetting sin
|
Tidiness
|
Relativism
|
Obscurity
|
Inspiring technology
|
Assembly
line
|
Internet
|
Solar
cell
|
Primary language
|
Architecture
|
Literature
|
Narrative
|
Presiding genius
|
Walter
Gropius
|
Jacques
Derrida
|
David
Bohm
|
Cheerleader
|
Roger
Fry
|
Charles
Jencks
|
Position vacant
|
Since publishing the book, I have wondered whether the besetting sin of the new humanism is really obscurity, after all. I'm not sure it isn't actually going to be pomposity - this is after all the sin of people who believe they are in communication with objective truth. So I am going to be very careful from now on not to be either obscure or pompous if I can possibly help it.
But do feel free to join in the real debate about the future: read The Age to Come: Authenticity, Post-modernism and how to survive what comes next (Endeavour Press). And let me know what you think!
Maybe the new movement will be post-humanism, a cybernetic extension of human limitations that can escape the event horizon of our collapsing civilized environment.
ReplyDelete